Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Полномочие как категория отечественной юриспруденции: диалектика многозначности и унифицированности (Russian)

Tytuł :
Полномочие как категория отечественной юриспруденции: диалектика многозначности и унифицированности (Russian)
Autorzy :
Лексин, И. В.
Pokaż więcej
Temat :
OBEDIENCE (Law)
JURISPRUDENCE
PUBLIC law
SCIENTIFIC knowledge
LEGAL rights
POWER (Philosophy)
DIALECTICAL behavior therapy
INDUCTION (Logic)
Alternatywny tytuł :
Authority as a Category of Russian Jurisprudence: Dialectics of Polysemy and Unification. (English)
Źródło :
Journal of Russian Law; 2021, Issue 4, p37-58, 22p
Abstract (English) :
The article examines a category, on the one hand, related to the well-known and widely used, and on the other, unjustifiably deprived of due attention from the general legal theory. In comprehending powers, each branch of jurisprudence is essentially left to itself. At the same time, in the public law sphere, in which the mention of powers is most in demand today, the conceptualization of this phenomenon is in the most neglected state. The purpose of the study is to assess the problems and prospects of conceptualizing powers as a general legal category. The article shows the dynamics of the use of the term "authority" in different areas of legal science and practice. It also touches upon the problem of translation from Western European languages; analyses the circle of persons vested with powers; critically analyses the connection of powers with rights and obligations and with legal status and general and special features of powers in different areas of legal regulation and in the relevant areas of scientific knowledge. Research is based on: general scientific (dialectical, deduction, induction, analysis, synthesis) and specific scientific (formal legal, comparative legal, historical legal) methods. On the basis of the conducted research, it establishes: discrepancies between the prevailing practice of using the word "authority" in public law regulation and in the relevant branches of legal science; practical unreasonableness of confusion of powers with rights and obligations; the sufficiency of universal features of powers in various spheres of legal regulation to give the powers of general legal understanding. The author recognizes the difficulty of such unification, but considers it as the most acceptable means of conceptualizing the considered phenomenon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Czasopismo naukowe
Copyright of Journal of Russian Law is the property of Legal Publishing House 'Norma' and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies