Mixing methods in randomized controlled trials (RCTs): Validation, contextualization, triangulation, and control.
RESEARCH methodology evaluation
PROGRAM effectiveness (Education)
RANDOMIZED controlled trials
Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability; Feb2010, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p5-28, 24p, 1 Diagram
In this paper we described how we mixed research approaches in a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) of a school principal professional development program. Using examples from our study we illustrate how combining qualitative and quantitative data can address some key challenges from validating instruments and measures of mediator variables to examining how contextual factors interact with the treatment. Describing how we transformed our qualitative and quantitative data, we consider how mixing methods enabled us to deal with the two core RCT challenges of random assignment and treatment control critical. Our account offers insights into ways of maximizing the potential of mixing research methods in RCTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)