Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

The impact of obesity on outcomes of midwife-led pregnancy and childbirth in a primary care population: a prospective cohort study.

Tytuł:
The impact of obesity on outcomes of midwife-led pregnancy and childbirth in a primary care population: a prospective cohort study.
Autorzy:
Daemers, DOA
Wijnen, HAA
Limbeek, EBM
Budé, LM
Nieuwenhuijze, MJ
Spaanderman, MEA
Vries, RG
Temat:
OBESITY
PREGNANCY
CHILDBIRTH
PRIMARY care
COHORT analysis
MEDICAL records
Źródło:
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; Oct2014, Vol. 121 Issue 11, p1403-1414, 12p
Czasopismo naukowe
Objective To assess the impact of obesity on the likelihood of remaining in midwife-led care throughout pregnancy and childbirth. Design Secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. Setting Dutch midwife-led practices. Population A cohort of 1369 women eligible for midwife-led care after their first antenatal visit. Methods First-trimester body mass index ( BMI) was calculated as weight measured at booking divided by height squared. Obstetric data were retrieved from medical records. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to examine the effects of BMI classification on midwife-led pregnancies and childbirths. Main outcome measures Percentages of women remaining in midwife-led care throughout pregnancy and throughout childbirth. Results Of women in obesity classes II and III, 55% remained in midwife-led care throughout pregnancy and 30% remained in midwife-led care throughout birth. Compared with women of normal weight, women in obesity classes II and III had fewer midwife-led pregnancies ( OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.69), and women who were overweight or in obesity class I had fewer midwife-led childbirths ( OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90; OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.84, respectively). Compared with women of normal weight, women who were obese had higher referral rates for hypertensive disorders (4 versus 14%), prolonged labour (4.6 versus 10.4%), and intrapartum pain relief (4 versus 10.4%). The women who were eligible for midwife-led birth and who were overweight or obese, had no more urgent referrals than women of normal weight. Women who were obese and who completed a midwife-led birth had no more adverse outcomes than women of normal weight, with the exception of higher rates of large for gestational age ( LGA) babies (>97.7 centile; 12.1%, versus 1.9% in normal weight and versus 3.3% in overweight women). Conclusions Although fewer women who were obese remain in midwife-led care during pregnancy and childbirth, there was no increased risk of unfavourable birth outcomes for women who were obese and eligible for a midwife-led birth when compared with women of normal weight. This indicates that when primary care midwives use a risk assessment tool throughout pregnancy and childbirth they are able to safely assign women who are obese to either midwife-led or obstetrician-led care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies