The lost critical history of radio.

We are currently in a new kind of "golden age" of soundwork, with creative forms proliferating across the airwaves and the internet. More creative soundwork than ever before is available; an old art form has been revived and exciting new voices can be heard. Yet, in the United States context in particular, something is missing: a critical sense of radio's history. For an art form to flourish, a sense of continuity and development, a knowledge of aesthetic roots and a sense of how the new connects with the old is vitally necessary for producers and for audiences. Despite some excellent new work and new initiatives, US radio history remains in a largely neglected state. There are two aspects to this dilemma: the problem of the archive and the problem of critical discourse. In the first case, in the US most of the historical evidence of radio's first four decades of innovation remains locked away behind obsolete and decaying technologies, in many cases uncatalogued and inaccessible. In the second case, US soundwork lacks a critical tradition. As a result, it remains a form cut off from its roots, with even its most talented contemporary practitioners innovating in a vacuum, giving audiences little purchase on how they might understand and appreciate the complexities of the best new work. Fortunately, the same digital opportunities that have sparked the radio revival also point towards solutions to neglect of its critical historiography. This article examines the dilemma of radio's missing critical history, making comparisons to other countries and pointing to new initiatives working to grant better exposure to radio archives and stimulate critical discussion and review1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Australian Journalism Review is the property of Intellect Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)