Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Treatment Failure Rates of Second-Generation Endometrial Ablation Devices in Premenopausal Women with BMI≥35 Kg/m2.

Tytuł:
Treatment Failure Rates of Second-Generation Endometrial Ablation Devices in Premenopausal Women with BMI≥35 Kg/m2.
Autorzy:
Parikh, S.
Smick, A.
Bird, L.M.
Patel, N.R.
Źródło:
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology; 2021 Supplement, Vol. 28 Issue 11, pS154-S155, 2p
Czasopismo naukowe
To investigate the treatment failure rates of second-generation endometrial ablation (EA) devices in obese women with BMI≥35 kg/m2 in a multi-site single health care system. Retrospective cohort study. Academic community health care system. Premenopausal women aged 18-51 years old who underwent second-generation endometrial ablation for benign indications. Women underwent Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA), Hydrothermal Ablation, Uterine Balloon Ablation, or Combined Argon/RFA Ablation between January 2010 to December 2020. 1328 women were identified who underwent second-generation EA of which 1198 patients met criteria. Failure was defined as re-intervention via repeat EA or hysterectomy for persistent uterine bleeding. The overall EA failure rate was 13.9%, with a total of 167 women who required a re-intervention. The proportion of women with BMI<35 kg/m2 vs BMI≥35 kg/m2 who had a re-intervention was 12.3% vs 17.6% (p=0.019), with an odds ratio of 1.520 (95% CI: 1.083-2.132). Common preoperative diagnoses for re-intervention were abnormal uterine bleeding (73.7%), pelvic pain (50.3%), and fibroid (29.9%). Significant findings on pathology reports after re-intervention showed adenomyosis (44.9%) and fibroids (40.7%). The median time lapse between initial EA and re-intervention was 477 days. Obesity (BMI≥35 kg/m2) is a risk factor for failure of an endometrial ablation procedure. These findings may be helpful in determining appropriate candidates for this treatment option, as well as improving counseling on possible failure and subsequent risk of re-intervention after an endometrial ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies