Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

The effect of dual-task training on cognition of people with different clinical conditions: An overview of systematic reviews

Tytuł :
The effect of dual-task training on cognition of people with different clinical conditions: An overview of systematic reviews
Autorzy :
Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva
Frederico Sander Mansur Machado
Vinícius Dias Rodrigues
Luana Lemos Leão
Renato Sobral Monteiro-Júnior
Pokaż więcej
Temat :
Dual-task training
Dual-task intervention
Motor cognitive training
Cognition
Executive functions
Memory
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Źródło :
IBRO Reports, Vol 9, Iss , Pp 24-31 (2020)
Wydawca :
Elsevier, 2020.
Rok publikacji :
2020
Kolekcja :
LCC:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Typ dokumentu :
article
Opis pliku :
electronic resource
Język :
English
ISSN :
2451-8301
Relacje :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451830120300200; https://doaj.org/toc/2451-8301
DOI :
10.1016/j.ibror.2020.06.005
Dostęp URL :
https://doaj.org/article/28a7123538d24fb58683899dee4cb023
Numer akcesji :
edsdoj.28a7123538d24fb58683899dee4cb023
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: The number of patients with cognitive impairment increases as the population becomes older. This perspective may persist a burden on health care systems unless considered new options of prevention and treatment. The aim of this meta-synthesis is to analyze different systematic reviews on the effectiveness of dual-task training (DTT) on cognition and motor function of different people. Methods: A systematic search of systematic reviews published until October 2019 was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Cochrane databases addressing studies which investigated the effect of DTT compared to control or other intervention on cognitive functions of healthy or unhealthy individuals. Three steps were followed to retrieve studies: reading title, abstract and full text. Checklist Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) was used to assess the quality of selected articles. Results: In terms of quality of evidence, according to AMSTAR, 62.5 % of the reviews were rated as being “low” and 37.5 % were graded as “moderate” quality. Two main themes were identified among the studies’ outcomes: Improvement on mobility performance or postural stability; and beneficial effect on cognitive function. In terms of effect size, there were reported an important variation, having more significant results for findings involving mobility and modest effect for findings regarding cognitive function. Conclusion: People with different clinical conditions could benefit from dual-task training. The benefits may encompass general cognitive functions, memory, physical performance, gait and balance, to name a few aspects.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies