-
Tytuł:
-
How to identify existing literature on patients’ knowledge, views, and values: the development of a validated search filter
-
Autorzy:
-
Monique Wessels, MSc
Lian Hielkema, BA
Trudy van der Weijden, MD, PhD
-
Temat:
-
Patient Preference
Patient Participation
Patient Rights
Patient-Centered Care
Information Storage and Retrieval/Methods
Sensitivity and Specificity
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Medicine
-
Źródło:
-
Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol 104, Iss 4 (2017)
-
Wydawca:
-
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh, 2017.
-
Rok publikacji:
-
2017
-
Kolekcja:
-
LCC:Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
LCC:Medicine
-
Typ dokumentu:
-
article
-
Opis pliku:
-
electronic resource
-
Język:
-
English
-
ISSN:
-
1536-5050
1558-9439
-
Relacje:
-
http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/150; https://doaj.org/toc/1536-5050; https://doaj.org/toc/1558-9439
-
DOI:
-
10.5195/jmla.2016.150
-
Dostęp URL:
-
https://doaj.org/article/c31c2f1328704b3f85a3b73c4b363d23  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
-
Numer akcesji:
-
edsdoj.31c2f1328704b3f85a3b73c4b363d23
-
Objective: The research sought to establish validated search filters for retrieval of studies on patients’ knowledge and values. Setting: Two nonprofit organizations in the Netherlands were studied for guideline development. Methods: An existing filter was adapted to three bibliographic interfaces. After defining the scope, a reference database was built for the development of the new filters. The performance of the new filters was validated in different disease categories. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, precision, negative predictive value, and accuracy were (%): 90.5/98/77/99.2/97 (MEDLINE-Ovid), 90.1/98.8/79.3/99.5/98.3 (PubMed), and 93.1/98.4/81.8/99.6/98.7 (Embase). Conclusions: The filters provide pragmatic tools for searching for patients’ issues. Further optimization and validation is recommended.