Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Comparison of short-term and survival outcomes for transanal natural orifice specimen extraction with conventional mini-laparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer

Tytuł:
Comparison of short-term and survival outcomes for transanal natural orifice specimen extraction with conventional mini-laparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer
Autorzy:
Zhou S
Wang X
Zhao C
Pei W
Zhou H
Liu Q
Liang J
Zhou Z
Temat:
Natural orifice specimen extraction
Transanal specimen extraction
Total laparoscopic resection
Sigmoid colon cancer
Rectal cancer
Surgical outcomes
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Źródło:
Cancer Management and Research, Vol Volume 11, Pp 5939-5948 (2019)
Wydawca:
Dove Medical Press, 2019.
Rok publikacji:
2019
Kolekcja:
LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
Typ dokumentu:
article
Opis pliku:
electronic resource
Język:
English
ISSN:
1179-1322
Relacje:
https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-short-term-and-survival-outcomes-for-transanal-natural-o-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR; https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322
Dostęp URL:
https://doaj.org/article/5ff0a144a44844efbbe8413cda14148f  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Numer akcesji:
edsdoj.5ff0a144a44844efbbe8413cda14148f
Czasopismo naukowe
Sicheng Zhou,* Xuewei Wang,* Chuanduo Zhao, Wei Pei, Haitao Zhou, Qian Liu, Jianwei Liang, Zhixiang Zhou, Xishan WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workBackground: Transanal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) in colorectal surgery has been introduced as a less invasive surgery. However, its long-term survival effects remain controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term survival outcomes of transanal NOSE with those of the conventional laparoscopic approach with mini-laparotomy (LAP) for anastomosis construction and specimen extraction in sigmoid colon cancer or rectal cancer.Methods: From January 2007 to January 2018, a retrospective study was conducted at the China National Cancer Center. In total, 52 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection with NOSE were matched with an additional 52 patients who underwent conventional LAP for colorectal cancer.Results: Patients in the NOSE group experienced shorter time to passage of flatus (2.8±0.8 vs 3.2±0.9 days; p=0.042), less pain (4.2±1.4 vs 5.4±1.7; p=0.003) and less analgesia required (7.7% vs 25.0%; p=0.032). After a median follow-up of 68.5 (range, 8–83) months, the two groups had similar 5-year overall survival rates (92.3% vs 94.2%; p=0.985) and disease-free survival rates (84.6% vs 86.5%; p=0.802).Conclusion: Transanal NOSE for total laparoscopic anterior resection is safe and feasible with more advantages, including lower pain, lower tissue trauma and faster recovery of intestinal function. Moreover, with proper protection of the surgical route, transanal NOSE has the same long-term outcomes as conventional laparoscopic surgery.Keywords: natural orifice specimen extraction, transanal specimen extraction, total laparoscopic resection, sigmoid colon cancer, rectal cancer, surgical outcomes

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies