Jianlin Xu,1,* Guozheng Ding,2,* Xueyan Zhang,1 Bo Jin,1 Yuqing Lou,1 Yanwei Zhang,1 Huiming Wang,1 Dan Wu,3 Baohui Han1 1Department of Pulmonary, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pulmonary, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anhui, People’s Republic of China; 3Central laboratory, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Introduction: Clinical evidence comparing chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as second-line therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are conflicting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed stage IV EGFR wild-type NSCLC patients who relapsed on first-line chemotherapy at the Shanghai Chest Hospital to compare the efficacy of TKIs and chemotherapy as second-line therapy among different clinical subgroups. Results: The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for patients receiving chemotherapy as second-line therapy for NSCLC were longer than patients who received TKIs. The hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.40 (P