Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Critical Thinking Dispositions of Social Studies Teacher Candidates

Tytuł:
Critical Thinking Dispositions of Social Studies Teacher Candidates
Autorzy:
Uslu, Salih (ORCID 0000-0003-0558-516X)
Deskryptory:
Critical Thinking
Social Studies
Preservice Teachers
Public Colleges
Measures (Individuals)
Foreign Countries
Student Characteristics
Personality Traits
Gender Differences
Thinking Skills
Język:
English
Źródło:
Asian Journal of Education and Training. 2020 6(1):72-79.
Dostępność:
Asian Online Journal Publishing Group. 244 Fifth Avenue Suite D42, New York, NY 10001. Fax: 212-591-6094; e-mail: ; Web site: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com
Recenzowane naukowo:
Y
Page Count:
8
Data publikacji:
2020
Typ dokumentu:
Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level:
Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Assessment and Survey Identifiers:
California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory
ISSN:
2519-5387
Abstractor:
As Provided
Data wpisu:
2020
Numer akcesji:
EJ1246039
Czasopismo naukowe
The main aim of this study is, to analyze critical thinking disposition of social studies teacher candidates. The study group is consisting of totally 250 teacher candidates voluntarily who are students of education faculty at social studies department in a state university. This study is used with descriptive survey method. The "Personal Information Form" was developed by the researchers used as data collection tools and The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI-R) which was developed by Facione, Facione, and Giancarlo (1998) and translated into Turkish by Kökdemir (2003) was used. Research data were analyzed with IBM SPSS 21.0 program. The independent samples t-test and One Way ANOVA were used for analyzing the datum. At the end of the study, it has been determined that in generally social studies teacher candidates have low level critical thinking disposition, obtained the average score related with subscales while the highest scores at the Analyticity subscale, the lowest average scores at Systematicity subscale. It has been seen that critical thinking disposition were not differentiated in terms of gender and class variables generally while significant differences were detected in the subscale dimensions. Some suggestions have been made in the light of these findings.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies