Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Current and Future Challenges of the Chinese Research System

Tytuł:
Current and Future Challenges of the Chinese Research System
Autorzy:
Horta, Hugo (ORCID 0000-0001-6814-1393)
Shen, Wenqin (ORCID 0000-0002-2121-4409)
Deskryptory:
Foreign Countries
Educational Research
Publications
Productivity
Research Administration
STEM Education
Intellectual Disciplines
Knowledge Economy
Competition
Faculty Publishing
Resource Allocation
Citations (References)
Indexes
Chinese
Global Approach
Język:
English
Źródło:
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2020 42(2):157-177.
Dostępność:
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Recenzowane naukowo:
Y
Page Count:
21
Data publikacji:
2020
Typ dokumentu:
Journal Articles
Reports - Research
DOI:
10.1080/1360080X.2019.1632162
ISSN:
1360-080X
Abstractor:
As Provided
Data wpisu:
2020
Numer akcesji:
EJ1254102
Czasopismo naukowe
This paper assesses the evolution and current situation of the Chinese research system, mainly the academic research system from 1996 to 2017, using trend analysis and the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index. Despite the impressive growth of China's knowledge capability, as measured by the number of publications in the international indexed literature over the past four decades, the country is still in a catching-up pattern with the world's most advanced research systems, instead of being a full-fledged scientific superpower. The analysis shows that China's publication growth has been to some extent inflated, as it was boosted by the inclusion of Chinese language journals in the international indexed literature. Therefore, this growth should be considered in a more moderate light. The competitiveness of China's disciplinary areas appears somewhat stalled when comparing the 1996-2000 and 2013-2017 periods, during which the same STEM-related disciplinary areas were the most competitive. This finding reveals not only a specialised knowledge structure, typical of catching-up countries, but also underperforming and neglected disciplinary areas in the social sciences, humanities and health sciences from a research funding standpoint. Based on this assessment, it is recommended that policymakers and university administrators change their focus from research quantity to research visibility by allocating funding in a less concentrated way to STEM fields, while promoting collaborative initiatives that can encourage the qualifications of academics and the visibility of the knowledge they produce.
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies