Since the 1970s, the construct of resilience has become detached from its original context of trauma and reassembled as a normative behavior, patterned after society's dominant class. A decade after becoming a focus of academic attention, resilience began to influence the advocacy community through the strengths-based approach commonly used by social workers. While many continue to use resilience within the context of trauma, mainstream society has marketed a new construct of resilience with dangerous, underlying assumptions. This conceptual article uses post-structuralism to problematize the construct of resilience within social work and provides suggestions on how to more cautiously and comprehensively implement resilience in social work education, practice, and research. This theoretical application of post-structuralism in social work is important in that it urges social workers to be more critical and to better advocate for marginalized groups through practices and methodologies. This work provides direction for future research, methodological and theoretical positioning for researchers, and guidance for skill building in social work education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Social Work is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.
