-
Tytuł:
-
Opioid Prescribing by Primary Care Providers: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant, and Physician Prescribing Patterns.
-
Autorzy:
-
Lozada, M. James (AUTHOR)
Raji, Mukaila A. (AUTHOR)
Goodwin, James S. (AUTHOR)
Kuo, Yong-Fang (AUTHOR)
-
Temat:
-
PHYSICIANS' assistants
NURSE practitioners
MEDICARE Part D
PRIMARY care
CROSS-sectional method
PHYSICIANS
OPIOIDS
-
Źródło:
-
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine. Sep2020, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p2584-2592. 9p. 2 Charts, 1 Graph, 1 Map.
-
Background: Prescription opioid overprescribing is a focal point for legislators, but little is known about opioid prescribing patterns of primary care nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs). Objective: To identify prescription opioid overprescribers by comparing prescribing patterns of primary care physicians (MDs), nurse practitioners (NPs), and physician assistants (PAs). Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of Medicare Part D enrollee prescription data. Participants: Twenty percent national sample of 2015 Medicare Part D enrollees. Main Measures: We identified potential opioid overprescribing as providers who met at least one of the following: (1) prescribed any opioid to > 50% of patients, (2) prescribed ≥ 100 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day to > 10% of patients, or (3) prescribed an opioid > 90 days to > 20% of patients. Key Results: Among 222,689 primary care providers, 3.8% of MDs, 8.0% of NPs, and 9.8% of PAs met at least one definition of overprescribing. 1.3% of MDs, 6.3% of NPs, and 8.8% of PAs prescribed an opioid to at least 50% of patients. NPs/PAs practicing in states with independent prescription authority were > 20 times more likely to overprescribe opioids than NPs/PAs in prescription-restricted states. Conclusions: Most NPs/PAs prescribed opioids in a pattern similar to MDs, but NPs/PAs had more outliers who prescribed high-frequency, high-dose opioids than did MDs. Efforts to reduce opioid overprescribing should include targeted provider education, risk stratification, and state legislation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)