Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ

Wyszukujesz frazę ""information management standards"" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł :
The organization of organizational knowledge
Autorzy :
BUDZAK, Danny
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Business information review. 30(4):183-190
Materiał oryginalny :
INIST-CNRS
Temat :
Apprentissage
Learning
Aprendizaje
Audit
Audición
Classification
Clasificación
Connaissance
Knowledge
Conocimiento
Courriel
Electronic mail
Correo electrónico
Document
Documento
Donnée
Data
Dato
Economie
Economy
Economía
Environnement
Environment
Medio ambiente
Etude cas
Case study
Estudio caso
Fichier
File
Fichero
Gestion des connaissances
Knowledge management
Gestión conocimiento
Gestion information
Information management
Gestión información
Information
Información
Norme
Standards
Norma
Organisation
Organization
Organización
Records management
Gestión de registros
Structure information
Information structure
Estructura información
Système information géographique
Geographic information system
Sistema información geográfica
Transfert
Transfer
Transferencia
Architecture de l'information
Business classification
GIS
London 2012 Olympic Games
case study
compliance
data audit
data transfer standard
data/information stewardship
document control standard
email audit
email standard file analysis
information architecture
information audit
information management standards
knowledge worker
learning environment legacy data management
records management
Sciences exactes et technologie
Exact sciences and technology
Sciences et techniques communes
Sciences and techniques of general use
Sciences de l'information. Documentation
Information science. Documentation
Sciences de l'information et des bibliothèques. Etude d'ensemble
Library and information science. General aspects
Sciences de l'information et de la communication
Information and communication sciences
Sciences de l'information communication
Documentation
Opis pliku :
text
Dostęp URL :
http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=search&terms=28149160
Czasopismo naukowe
Tytuł :
A multi-method quality improvement approach to systematically improve and promote the quality of national health and social care information.
Autorzy :
McGrath N; Health Information and Quality Authority, Ireland.; University College Cork, Ireland.
Foley B; Health Information and Quality Authority, Ireland.
Hurley C; Health Information and Quality Authority, Ireland.
Ryan M; Health Information and Quality Authority, Ireland.
Flynn R; Health Information and Quality Authority, Ireland.
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia [Health Inf Manag] 2020 Jun 26, pp. 1833358320926422. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 26.
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Journal Info :
Publisher: SAGE Publications Country of Publication: Australia NLM ID: 9438200 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1833-3575 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 18333583 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Health Inf Manag Subsets: Health Administration
Czasopismo naukowe
Tytuł :
Conceptual Framework for a New Tool for Evaluating the Quality of Diabetes Consumer-Information Web Sites
Źródło :
1
Index Terms :
Original Paper
Internet/standards
information management/standards
medical informatics/standards
guidelines
quality of health care
diabetes
URL :
http://hdl.handle.net/1807/4679">http://hdl.handle.net/1807/4679
Kiley Robert. Does the internet harm health? Some evidence exists that the internet does harm health. BMJ Jan 26, 2002. Vol. 324(7331) p. 238-9.
Research Unit for Cybermedicine & E-health, Department of Clinical Social Medicine, University of Heidelberg. Database of Adverse Events Related to the Internet (DAERI). URL: http://www.medcertain.org/daeri/ [accessed 2003 Oct 3]
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century National Academies Press; Washington, DC. Jun 1, 2001. URL: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309072808/html
Shepperd Sasha, Charnock Deborah. Against internet exceptionalism. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 556-7. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/556
Purcell Gretchen P, Wilson Petra, Delamothe Tony. The quality of health information on the internet. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 557-8. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/557
Berland G K, Elliott M N, Morales L S, Algazy J I, Kravitz R L, Broder M S, Kanouse D E, Muñoz J A, Puyol J A, Lara M, Watkins K E, Yang H, Mcglynn E A. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA May 23, 2001. Vol. 285(20) p. 2612-21.
Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ Jun 28, 1997. Vol. 314(7098) p. 1875-9. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/314/7098/1875
Pandolfini Chiara, Bonati Maurizio. Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 582-3. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/582
Hatfield C L, May S K, Markoff J S. Quality of consumer drug information provided by four Web sites. Am J Health Syst Pharm Nov 15, 1999. Vol. 56(22) p. 2308-11.
Culver J D, Gerr F, Frumkin H. Medical information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board. J Gen Intern Med Aug 1997. Vol. 12(8) p. 466-70.
Meric Funda, Bernstam Elmer V, Mirza Nadeem Q, Hunt Kelly K, Ames Frederick C, Ross Merrick I, Kuerer Henry M, Pollock Raphael E, Musen Mark A, Singletary S Eva. Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 577-81. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/577
Eysenbach Gunther, Powell John, Kuss Oliver, Sa Eun-Ryoung. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA May 22, 2002. Vol. 287(20) p. 2691-700.
Wyatt J C. Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web. BMJ Jun 28, 1997. Vol. 314(7098) p. 1879-81.
Eysenbach G, Diepgen T L. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. BMJ Nov 28, 1998. Vol. 317(7171) p. 1496-500. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/317/7171/1496
Joubert M, Aymard S, Fieschi D, Fieschi M. Quality criteria and access characteristics of Web sites: proposal for the design of a health Internet directory. Proc AMIA Symp 1999. p. 824-828.
Jones J. Development of a self-assessment method for patients to evaluate health information on the Internet. Proc AMIA Symp 1999. p. 540-544.
Teach L. Evaluating health-related Web sites. URL: http://www.sph.emory.edu/WELLNESS/abstract.html [accessed 2000 Apr 2]
Spence WC. The librarian as Webliographer: finding, evaluating, and using health sciences resources on the Internet. URL: http://www.umdnj.edu/~spence/metro/evaluate.htm [accessed 2000 Apr 2]
Coutts HT. Critical evaluation of resources on the Internet. URL: http://www.library.ualberta.ca/library_html/help/pathfinders/qual.html [accessed 2000 Apr 2]
Wilkinson GL, Bennett LT, Oliver KM. Evaluating the quality of Internet information sources: consolidated listing of evaluation criteria and quality indicators. URL: http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/Faculty/gwilkinson/criteria.html [accessed 2000 Apr 2]
Testa J. Current Web contents: developing Web site selection criteria. URL: http://www.isinet.com/hot/essays/23.html [accessed 2000 Apr 2]
Price S L, Hersh W R. Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Symp 1999. p. 911-5. URL: http://www.amia.org/pubs/symposia/D005524.PDF
Shon J, Musen M A. The low availability of metadata elements for evaluating the quality of medical information on the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Symp 1999. p. 945-9. URL: http://www.amia.org/pubs/symposia/D005476.PDF
Eysenbach G. 1st progress report MedCERTAIN project. Vol 1: quality of health information on the Web, version 1.8 [extract]. University of Heidelberg; Heidelberg. 2001. URL: http://www.medcertain.org/metadata/progress-report1-7-medpics.pdf
Eysenbach Gunther, Köhler Christian. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 573-7. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/573
Roter D L, Hall J A. Health education theory: an application to the process of patient-provider communication. Health Educ Res Jun 1991. Vol. 6(2) p. 185-93.
Bertakis K D, Roter D, Putnam S M. The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction. J Fam Pract Feb 1991. Vol. 32(2) p. 175-81.
Lohr K N, Grossman J H, Cassel C K. From the Institute of Medicine. JAMA Oct 27, 1993. Vol. 270(16) p. 1911.
Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed?. JAMA Sep 23, 1988. Vol. 260(12) p. 1743-8.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). Home page. URL: http://www.jcaho.org/ [accessed 2003 Nov 17]
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Home page. URL: http://www.ncqa.org/index.asp [accessed 2003 Nov 17]
Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (URAC). Home page. URL: http://urac.org/ [accessed 2003 Nov 17]
National Committee for Quality Assurance. Health plan data and information set, 2001 National Committee for Quality Assurance; Washington, DC. 2001.
Lohr K N. Outcome measurement: concepts and questions. Inquiry 1988. Vol. 25(1) p. 37-50.
Rubin H R, Pronovost P, Diette G B. The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality. Int J Qual Health Care Dec 2001. Vol. 13(6) p. 469-74. URL: http://intqhc.oupjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=reprint&pmid=11769749
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Cholesterol management screening and control. URL: http://www.ncqa.org/somc2001/cholesterol/somc_2001_chm.html [accessed 2003 Nov 17]
Donabedian A. The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. QRB Qual Rev Bull Nov 1992. Vol. 18(11) p. 356-60.
Gibson P G, Coughlan J, Wilson A J, Abramson M, Bauman A, Hensley M J, Walters E H. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000. (2) p. CD001117.
Kelly C S, Morrow A L, Shults J, Nakas N, Strope G L, Adelman R D. Outcomes evaluation of a comprehensive intervention program for asthmatic children enrolled in medicaid. Pediatrics May 2000. Vol. 105(5) p. 1029-35. URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10790458
Gibson P G, Coughlan J, Abramson M. Self-management education for adults with asthma improves health outcomes. West J Med May 1999. Vol. 170(5) p. 266. URL: http://www.ewjm.com/cgi/reprint/170/5/266.pdf
Hopman W M, Owen J G, Gagne E. Assessment of the effect of asthma education on outcomes. Manag Care Interface May 1999. Vol. 12(5) p. 89-93.
Forshee J D, Whalen E B, Hackel R, Butt L T, Smeltzer P A, Martin J, Lavin P T, Buchner D A. The effectiveness of one-on-one nurse education on the outcomes of high-risk adult and pediatric patients with asthma. Manag Care Interface Dec 1998. Vol. 11(12) p. 82-92.
Piette J D, Weinberger M, Mcphee S J. The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care: a randomized, controlled trial. Med Care Feb 2000. Vol. 38(2) p. 218-30.
Tilly K F, Belton A B, Mclachlan J F. Continuous monitoring of health status outcomes: experience with a diabetes education program. Diabetes Educ 1995. Vol. 21(5) p. 413-9.
Moore S M. The effects of a discharge information intervention on recovery outcomes following coronary artery bypass surgery. Int J Nurs Stud Apr 1996. Vol. 33(2) p. 181-9.
Jadad A R, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?. JAMA Feb 25, 1998. Vol. 279(8) p. 611-4.
Gagliardi Anna, Jadad Alejandro R. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 569-73. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/569
Wilson Petra. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 598-602. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/598
Boyer C, Selby M, Scherrer J R, Appel R D. The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites. Comput Biol Med Sep 1998. Vol. 28(5) p. 603-10.
Hi-Ethics. Home page. URL: http://www.hi-ethics.org/ [accessed 2003 Nov 17]
URAC. Health Web site standards: version 1.0. 2001. URL: http://webapps.urac.org/websiteaccreditation/Portal/Business/Docs/web%20site%20stds%20v1-0.doc [accessed 2003 Oct 3]
Fox S, Rainie L. Vital decisions: how Internet users decided what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Pew Internet & American Life Project; Washington, DC. May 22, 2002. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Vital_Decisions_May2002.pdf
Shannon Claude E, Weaver Warren. Mathematical Theory of Communication University of Illinois Press; Urbana, IL. Oct 1, 1963.
Zasób elektroniczny
Tytuł :
Design and Testing of a Tool for Evaluating the Quality of Diabetes Consumer-Information Web Sites
Źródło :
1
Index Terms :
Original Paper
Internet/standards
information management/standards
medical informatics/standards
guidelines
quality of health care
diabetes
URL :
http://hdl.handle.net/1807/4680">http://hdl.handle.net/1807/4680
Seidman Joshua J, Steinwachs Donald, Rubin Haya R. Conceptual framework for a new tool for evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information Web sites. J Med Internet Res Nov 27, 2003. Vol. 5(4) p. e29. URL: http://www.jmir.org/2003/4/e29
Eysenbach Gunther, Powell John, Kuss Oliver, Sa Eun-Ryoung. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA May 22, 2002. Vol. 287(20) p. 2691-700.
American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations 2000. Diabetes Care Jan 2000. Vol. 23
No authors listed. DQIP measures now put providers on same page in gauging quality diabetes care. Diabetes Quality Improvement Project. Qual Lett Healthc Lead Feb 2000. Vol. 12(2) p. 10-12.
Direct Hit. Home page. URL: http://www.directhit.com/ [accessed 2003 Nov 16]
Catch the Web [computer program]. Home page. URL: http://www.catchtheweb.com/ [accessed 2003 Nov 16]
Feinstein A R, Cicchetti D V. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990. Vol. 43(6) p. 543-9.
Lin L I. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics Mar 1989. Vol. 45(1) p. 255-68.
National Committee for Quality Assurance. The state of managed care quality report, 2001 URL: http://www.ncqa.org/somc2001/ [accessed 2003 Nov 16]
National Committee for Quality Assurance. Beta blocker treatment. State of managed care report, 2001 URL: http://www.ncqa.org/somc2001/BETA_BL/BBH_fig.html [accessed 2003 Nov 16]
Fox S, Rainie L. Vital decisions: how Internet users decided what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Pew Internet & American Life Project; Washington, DC. May 22, 2002. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Vital_Decisions_May2002.pdf
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych Bull 1979. Vol. 86(2) p. 420-428.
Budrock EI, Fleiss JL, Hardesty AS. A new view of interobserver agreement. Perspect Psychol 1963. Vol. 16 p. 373-384.
Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics Mar 1977. Vol. 33(1) p. 159-74.
Donner A. Sample size requirements for the comparison of two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement. Stat Med May 30, 1998. Vol. 17(10) p. 1157-68.
Shrout P E. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res Sep 1998. Vol. 7(3) p. 301-17.
Berland G K, Elliott M N, Morales L S, Algazy J I, Kravitz R L, Broder M S, Kanouse D E, Muñoz J A, Puyol J A, Lara M, Watkins K E, Yang H, Mcglynn E A. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA May 23, 2001. Vol. 285(20) p. 2612-21.
Zasób elektroniczny

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies